Orion smoking nothing drinking last night yes
This round again shows why size is the measure for the win⌠we actually opped down our own attackers science to reduce NW so we could take more planets and invested in defense so we could keep them⌠really nobody cares for an eor jump 
Size always lol, nw is used for taking planets, eor jumps are just for show. 
Surely, some do. ![]()
I think what you mean to say is âMy family and I didnât care for an eor jump.â ![]()
And neither did any of the other fams in the race except for Sols fam - Iâm pretty sure Solâs fam, didnât care for the eor nw, but agree size is the win measure )hence their effort to stay in front).
The question in your poll is about the measure of skills, and Iâm discussing what determines the round winner.
Iâd be sursrised if someone eels NW determines the real winner⌠if anyone feels that: please let me know, Iâd like to know why you think that 
Methano: definitely NW
Size is what we were most interested in and was our main focus.
We did a jump as we thought we had a decent shot at getting both size and nw.
Over all 31 was the dominant family this round. We had a shot at taking the final rankings as we didnât have a big war.
If it wasnât for 30 I think we probably would have stayed ahead on pcount but 31 did really well to catch us regardless and deserved the win.
fair enough
I agree with this.
That would be an illegal alliance, wouldnât it?
Yes, both NW and size should skill, no doubt about that. But what determines who won the round? Size.
I keep with the comparison to a football (US: soccer) match. NW is like ball possession, succesful passes, shots fire at the goal of the opponent etc. Itâs definitely a strong indicator of the strength of the team. But in the end it does not reflect who won the match. Goals do.
Size = goals scored.
Yeah but when your team has 12 active members and the other team has 4 and no goalie, goals are not a measure of skill. I donât think this question can ever really be answered other than the perception of the community deciding who was the best.
Maybe pie is the best because he doesnât Play? Maybe we are all losers for being slave to IC and having to log on each hour! I donât know 
Fair point - but that will go for both NW and size. 12 active players will have so much more infra momentum, they will greatly outperform the other team with 4 players and no goalie in networth as well
Size would still be the measure for who wins.
Of course you have great teams versus poor teams sometimes, that doesnât change how to measure the winner.
indeedo
I am sure I used to think NW was the most important when I played âback in the dayâ but I now can see that size is as important. Although I have noticed that if you click on rankings it defaults to showing it ranked by NW!
size has always won rounds⌠nw is a important factor yes⌠but doesnt give you the win
Yeah, I think it was always best to win both!
Hi @scorp
yoooooo
Sorry for killing you in sn youâre still my boy tho