If you can tell me the total race points for each standard race I will give it a go.
1 Like
Since Pie didn’t, I’ve done the math for you:
Revalons: 200 points
Wardancers: 205 points, also warcry is still fucked so 205 points is probably inaccurate too
Camaar: 2̶3̶0̶ ̶p̶o̶i̶n̶t̶s̶ 130 points
Quantam: 240 points
Partaxian: 240 points
Now we just need @I_like_pie to name a target amount of points and you’re good to go
1 Like
A post was split to a new topic: Suggested Race Rebalancing
Thanks @Rawrr, and kudos @OrBit for following through. I’ve moved it to its own topic so other can chime in.
Getting back to OH specifically, I’m going to plan this change for the next round:
There’s a split opinion on whether or not OH or OP Pax is the issue. The OH change is a smaller fix, so we’ll go with that one for now while assessing the race balance in general in the other thread.
We can change OH back if needed.
3 posts were merged into an existing topic: Suggested Race Rebalancing
Related to this subject, can we say the same about E-storms?
I just got hit with 20 estorms from 1 player and my population has dropped from 28mill to 11mill in 1 tick.
I presume by the time the 8 ticks of e-storm are up I will have pretty much zero population and will make no cash for the rest of the round 
There used to be limit to those. I guess it is gone too.
The question is though were you running a sensible amount of wizards yourself. You could have still the original 10 wizards and lost your pop, or you could have 20% of your NW as wizards…
I dont think the amount of wizards I had is important when the pax that opped me looks to have around 200k or something. If a Pax jumps wizz, then they are going to succeed.
They won’t suceed every time if you have a decent defence yourself.
If I had 20% Of my networth as wizards at the time I would need to have 300k wizards 
Lets say I had 100k for arguements sake:
Me:
100k * -10% Magic = 90k Wizards
Pax
200k * 70% Magic = 340k wizards
Maybe he wouldnt succeed every time, but I bet at least 50% would. Thats 10 estorms and im still dead as a pop banker.
100k wizards would be 6.6% of your NW, which seems low to me. If he’d failed any he’d lose 5% of his wizards which would help you out massively.
By my memory they can do 7 spells in a tick so if they’d failed 50% no idea how you get to 10 e-storms.
If you can get wizards to a point of failing 50% of the time it really nullifys their attack as it reduces down to 4 e-storms, but also 4 fails would take them from 200k > 162k wizards and the rate of failure will massively increase.
The single Pop banker in the galaxy with a crazy big pop should maybe not stay Revalons when the round is getting exciting.
3 Likes
I killed Luker off from my family last round because he couldn’t understand the concept of defences. He’s just rubbish.