@Vegnarok I prefer the evil dictator accusation. At least that one’s possible in real life!
1 Like
I think that’s treemendoush. Just treemend - YUGE.
2 Likes
If pie is god im surely screwed and going to hell, I’ve had many arguments and fights with “god” 
4 Likes
Different eras man, fams were 20 and you would get a player in a tick or two easy.
Most of them (the over whelming majority of them) were just trying to random into fams they wanted to be in.
I ahve never removed a legit players that ever said “Yeah lets get this family on”.
PA you wont “allow a person to SS” (tho did allow me - that was cool) so what do you do when a person insists?
I commented on a public thread. It’s not on you to dictate who can or can not contribute to a public #universal-news discussion.
It was unique yes, but the moment you post it to the entire community you no longer own the discussion — the community does, and I am still part of the community.
And again I didn’t make any posts “disappear”, I moved the ones that you yourself flagged as off-topic, and the relevant replies.
I agreed with your flags. 
I really do think you are set on being a victim here; no amount of logic seems to be convincing you that I’m not out to get you and side with your enemies.
Again, why would I? If I really wanted to manipulate the outcome I could just edit the database and give people free resources lol.
@Malin burn baby burn! Disco inferno! 
Where else could one do such a thing?
Please note, for the meat of that exceeding long thread it was only you, and the players involved.
Why do you think that was?
Galactic congress! We may have found a good argument for why it should come back. 
Seems the nature of conversation: the players involved would obviously have opinions about your statements, and I have opinions about your accusations against others.
1 Like
Well, it didn’t that day.
You got that shit right.
What was that conversation actually about pie?
Have you read it?
PA says it was about whining.
AW thinks its about pride.
What does Pie think.
I and a few other feel it was about one unstated topic.
1 Like
What the fuck did I just attempt to read 
1 Like
We now have a galactic congress in discord for MW this round 
and are self policing nap breakers and griefers. This wasn’t allowed before with UA’s being illegal. Should prove interesting. Restoring honor back to the galaxy!
2 Likes
Yeay!
Chat is pretty short term for that to work.
Forums are forever, and far more expressive.
@Picklearmy
I have asked you several times for leadership advice, thank you by the way - that has never been my forte.
I am very curious what you do when a player refuses to give up SS, and explores all over the map?
I remember you had (and was pissed it didn’t go well) us kill our “Gulltony” and he was @ 100p.
If you remember correctly he was killed off because he was giving other fams advanced warning that we were going to attack them… and then you gave him one of the worst tongue lashings I have ever seen.
That’s a great question!
It was initially about nap negotiations, but about half way through devolved into you and others insulting each other and disagreeing about what happened, and debate over the nap terms.
At the point I joined in, it also became about player killing because I felt compelled to call you out on what I still see as you using a hypocritical position to cast other players’ actions in an unreasonable light.
Afterward, it devolved to an accusation that I have a reason to pick sides in a war in which I have no investment and am out to get you for reasons of which I am still unsure.
To the players involved, it was about the war and the nap talks. To me, it was about addressing the “you’re bad for the game” accusations that I think ironically drive people away from the community.
Thank you, I don’t remember specifically, and do not doubt you.
Would you please answer this part too?
Wow. I had a conversation like this at a school reunion a while ago.
It went along the lines of…
Them: “Well she liked me, and you ended up with her. Then you cheated on her with another girl. That broke my heart”.
Me: “That was 25 years ago”
Them: “Yes, but it still hurts”
…
…
Me: “Really?!”
Me: “We probably shouldn’t talk again”
2 Likes
You want to bring honor when you are part of the problem? How can you breed a solution? Parties that were not involved, that are transparent and objective should be the ones to spear head this sort of effort…
1 Like
Thank you.
To me, and a few others, that entire thread was about Honor, what it means to the top tri.
How far is to far, is there a limit, and specifically “The Greatest Attacker In Modern IC History’s” the “Lion” himself’s thoughts on the topic.
His standards
For the King, all of his little followers must adhere - for his will represents the will of the family, or they will turn on him.
Kinda like removing muti’s and inactives.
You don’t like a guy doing that, dont fucking vote for him.
If you feel it is strong enough to leave a fam or attempt to usurp, then do that.
Not my fucking problem till the fucking overlord of the game jumps in off topic, and just wrecks a thread about it.
Take away leadership, you could have voted me out in the Muppets.
Not important enough to change your vote, but important enough wreck a very unique, and nuanced thread about it?
PA is swinging his big pet names around this week an awful lot, and talking a whole shit ton of smak, so if he is toppled you gonna jump in and remind him too?
So you have to be down and out to get admonished by Pie?
You can keep claiming this, but it isn’t true. You brought up player killing, not me.
I’m not admonishing anybody, I am calling out hypocrisy. Such as this:
This is exactly what you were trying to do to @Malin in the muppets fam when you declared him rogue and set out to kill him off because he didn’t agree with you controlling what race he was allowed to play. This was despite the majority of the family saying “no, he’s active and skilled and wants to play”.
We even had multiple votes on the topic despite you giving me and Caed “veto powers” that proved to not have any meaning because when we tried to veto the decision you just ignored it and held a 2nd fam-wide vote.
Have you considered the possibility that I’m not arbitrarily picking you to admonish, and am simply taking issue with an unreasonable stance given your past actions?