@Hala looks like u are not aware that your own alliance started asking help from outside alliance nap BEFORE we opped your iron.
So lets get this straight with facts now :
04 asking 95 to clear 94 attackers in 04 core because big eor war is coming
when we(91) opp 04/98 iron its problems because its help outside alliance nap?
So we retaliate to your own move, were we really that much better on that so u guys couldnt handle it and went for nap breaking?
U can see after 04 asked to clear 94 attackers, 02/94 did not break nap because of it.
Here is proof that 04 asked 95 to clear 94 attackers, if TBO is not wrong, then it was 16 hours before we jumped our wizards
@Hala so after knowing this, how would your excuse be for nap breaking now?
Edit: I did read all your posts tru Hala, u blame nap breaking on that moves what were made outside alliance nap families. So u certantly didnt know that 04 started it.
So if im getting it right, from your @Hala point of view, 02/94 should have voided nap themselves because your alliance started asking help outside alliance.
I stand by my actions. I looked at the information in front of me. Was annoyed that ops had been used on war savings and made the decision to support the alliance that lets be honest had babysat and protected us all round. i’m not saying i liked every decision made this round and the way things turned out. I do consider myself an honourable player and have never broke a nap before but this whole round has felt almost dishonest and strange and i think set the tone for everyone.
There are 2 sides to this story but no one can claim to be squeaky clean. (Maybe dark as haven’t really heard, seen or had any issue with him since the 1st war lol) 1 man army to his defence.
@Darrk i have never in my IC career have got invovled in chat activity, i post when it fits my needs. i’m a fan of yours so don’t disrepect me. if you want to mad at anyone go talk to your ex horde mates for abanding you and leaving you all alone to play with novices. . Don’t join the group of players who take this game way to serious
@Rookie yes 91 opped your savings they had no nap with you since use(your alliance) broke it and farmed them. They were not apart of our allaince nap.
Let look at all the facts. Aw had first contacted 99 gave them info so they could raid and war us right after we napped then had them pass them shares in our core. If use are allowed to have third party help so can we, we just did it much better and that’s why use try to lie and justify your reasoning.
Your alliance broke naps all round and farmed bottom fams and farmed fams to death. Use have no honor so no matter what lies use come up with we do have proof to say otherwise
You are a coward and a traitor and shall be labeled as such. I am still waiting for that promised beating you’ll give me before EOR but all you have done is had once failed attack since that conversation and continue to attack my wife instead.
You belong with the rest of IC’s most dishonorable, which at this point I would place you and @Lord_Pickle at a higher standing than even @Airwing as at least I can learn from AW, he is a good player in practice.
You are nothing but a noob who hit’s lowbies all round and an traitor, to both your family and your alliance.
I didn’t break the nap with 91 as i didn’t want to hit them. I haven’t farmed any fams i spent most of this round attempting to keep my core clean. I have been honest about everything and haven’t denied anything. Bit unfair to say i have no honour when this is the first nap ever broke and have no history of farming or anything. I have a lot of respect for you Pwvet so its a shame you feel that way after one nap break that i was honest and open about and i’m unsure on this proof aspect but can only go of what i was shown and seen and made the decision based on that.
I’m not aware of that action of 04, but if that’s right, and 04 not only asked, but funded and got help from them, then yes. You could and should have voided the NAP yourself.
That.
+annoyed is: consider a gun-for-hire an aggressive action.
So @Hala your excuse for nap breaking kinda fell down after coming public that your own alliance started using help outside of alliance, before your enemies.
So what would be the reason(excuse) for nap breaking?
Also be honest, if in the future, any player would sign nap with you, would you be cool if they void the nap on you, with an excuse of u being nap breaker before(therefore harder to trust), would u be cool with it?
I have no beef with you @Rookie , u helped me when i asked, with no question asked(no excuses made) that was perfect. I like you
But 1 thing i want to explain, that your own alliance(04 mainly or only them) , asked fam 95 to clear 94 attackers from 04 systems - meaning, your alliance started using help outside of the alliance nap. U know its bad if they let others clear their(94) attackers spread.
After that being done by your alliance, after that, i repeat after that, we(91) opped 04/98 iron savings, especially after that when 04 attack us while being allied, and 98 just break nap on us.
Retaliation after that by us, is more than justified, would u agree with me on this?
The half truths and hipocrisy in this thread is laughable.
They were only in our core as they were funding 01 to take planets in our core and then swap them to Armada in the same tick. Not against the rules maybe but against the spirit of any NAP
Believe what you will. This wasnt the first or only planet swaps that went on but I dont tend to screen print the ticker every time.
The toxic crap, lies half truths and bullshit coming out of this round has killed my interest in this game and in all likelihood won’t be returning anyways. Next round you’ll have to find some other reason to rant, abuse troll or whatever.
. Don’t join the group of players who take this game way to serious 
That.
