Your welcome 
Except you agreed earlier that both did, so which is it?
What I am saying is if one constitutes a nap void so does the other. What Darrk is saying is one does but the other doesn’t.
Either they both void a nap which means nap was voided when TBO jumped wiz with some aid from your alliance. In which case we didn’t break a nap as it was previously voided. Or neither of them void nap which means that Darrks nap with us would have remained in tact until an official notice was given and the cancel term had expired.
So if the first case is true it means we didn’t break a nap as it was already previously void.
If the second case is true then we did break nap but then so did Darrk.
You can’t allow the assumption of one thing to be true without allowing the assumption of another.
2 Likes
Thank you @Remo for a logical breakdown of your argument that doesn’t include any insults.
Does anybody on the other side care to address this point in a way that also doesn’t include any insults?
Come on guys, we can do this.
Just like you guys did with 99 to 02 ? Like 1/2 days after we signed the nap right ?
Dont be such ignorant to your own flaws as well then
Remo can you also exsplain if the 2nd part of no naps being broken, then doesn’t that mean WS and Swagga broke a nap in order to attack us with the others when we all agreed to a perm nap after their 2nd loss?
well thats BS 
… u broke one this round dude…
if i can wake up to threads like this everyday i might keep playing LOL 
BRAVO BRAVO!
What are you guys bitching about, UA is legal this round, so aiding an other fam to opp a fam you are napped with is legal, although you all may not like it or are pissy you didn’t think of this yourself. But using that as an excuse to break a nap is just sad, especially if you also use the argument you are quitting after this round, which seems to be the main reason to break the nap.
And the remark about never breaking an ingame nap doesn’t make a difference, other than how bad you may want to, you just can’t break an ingame signed nap.
Anyways, this will also be my last round, lately it seems shady stuff like this happends every round. Like somebody ‘pulling a Rivan near EOR’.
(VL) Rivan Alluviator 176,067 13
Hehehe
1 Like
Dissapointed I havent seen @Hala’s popcorn panda in here
2 Likes
I dare everyone to not write in this forum post ever again and move in with it all?
2 Likes
This will always be imperial conflict
There’s always someone right and someone wrong.
Shake hands move on and kill each other ingame for future rounds to come.
Either way this dribble has to stop. Every post is actually the same content. Over and over.
Move on lads.
2 Likes
To be completely fair pie, this entire thread is because of NAP breaks, and if the game provided us enough in game NAP’s this entire thread would never of happened. You simply can’t change people, only their environment.
I think this had to be said because you keep commenting on an issue you have no actual investment in and keep siring the pot, and yet are the only one with the actual ability to fix the problem. Don’t have a NAP limit ffs.
I think @Darrk would agree here.
1 Like
Easypeas:
- Their only proof = “one guy said it in chat”.
- Our proof, hundreds of attacks by their tri in everyone’s news / the uni ticker with no cancellation.
1 Like
I think a lot of people would agree.
I did ask pie about that - and he said:
I think there is a change coming about this.
1 Like
You cannot blame pie for individuals actions
He is looking to you all for a solution as usual 
I will say:
NAP breaks
NAPvoids
Illegal or underhand tactics
Trash talk
Have and always will be a part of IC. From day one to present.
Nothing Pie can do, can fix that. People will always find a way no matter what. There will always be that one loophole. That one way to get the upper hand.
1 Like
Actually, @I_like_pie is trying all kinds of stuff next round to limit it!
Like really good stuff!
1 Like
This makes no sense, you can’t have a NAP limit to prevent people from not fighting, then allow Unofficial NAP’S, and then get mad at the chaos that ensues because of said NAP’S.
@I_like_pie this is kinda all your fault bud, and if this is the non insulting conclusion you wanted us to come to then I wanna go back to swearing at PA, because I love you and your game man. Please fix this for next round and give us at least 10 naps with a 15 fam gal.
I actually agree with this now.
@Undeath said something like this a few weeks ago, and I think you are both right.
Didn’t used too, do now.
I can’t wait for next round.
Also - @Prince_of_the_Galaxy Thank you for jumping in and saving the round, what you and @Pwvet did this round was stuff of legend imho.
They would have just ganked everyone into the ground one fam at a time.
1 Like
Like I said, you can;t change people, only their environment. If the swearing and insulting is a problem for him then he needs to make steps to prevent it from happening in the first place as he can’t change the people, and is the only one who can change the environment.
If the game is to self moderate and this is the solution we think is worth a try to prevent this in the future it should be implemented.
1 Like