Constructive feedback

I had written out a post that covered why most of this is completely untrue, and then I deleted it.

Instead, here’s a quick summary:

  • Features are claimed to be untested, even though they were in fact tested.

  • The hangouts are portrayed as vague and directionless, even though they cover our roadmap and specific features. (listen for yourself)

  • It is claimed that there is no interest in fixing underlying problems, despite the fact that I’ve taken time to have lengthy 1-on-1 conversations with this player to explore specific solutions. It’s as if these conversations never happened. :man_shrugging:

@Airwing, I appreciate your insight and opinion, but it isn’t a productive use of my time anymore to respond to these kinds of blatant mis-represenations of IC’s development efforts.

Despite the title, this is not constructive feedback.

If anybody has questions about what we are doing or not doing, or why we are doing it or not doing it, please ask. I’m very willing to provide details and insight into our direction and development efforts. I always have been.

Unfortunately though, I am no longer willing to spend so much time and effort responding to assumptions, false statements, and mis-representations of our efforts.

Thanks for understanding.

1 Like