I know historically we have judged fams based on NW and planet-size. However, I think these options only encourage saving and eco’ing all round. I propose a change in standards.
I think a change in criteria may change how people play this game
Fam HOF: 1) family production in resources (either each can have a category or each item could have a point total labelled for each resource). 2) Planets won from other fams.
I don’t care much for NW cause I think most of us here would say that is a fairly hollow number. However, I think these measures would push people into more conflict if families were judged based on their planet counts MINUS those they explored themselves.
Individual HOF: Should be broken down into 3 categories 1) bankers and rezzies, 2) Oppers, 3) attackers
- should be pretty obvious
- award for most ops and success rate
- attackers - most fresh planets taken, most planets retaken, (maybe other conflict categories)
Something interesting, is that each category of player could have also ranked against each other. Hence, a banker could could also have a category of most attack of fresh planets, or ops etc.